User Menu


spacer image
Steroid Laws
 
Steroid Profiles
steroids
 
  Share
Search
Archive
From:
To:

Category: Training / All Categories

Biomechanical Strength Part II

Biomechanical Strength, By: Tony Reynolds, MS, CSCS, YCS II

Part II

Due to the multi-dimensional properties associated with free weights, they have been considered the optimal method for training athletes, yet they are not without fault (Behm, 1988; Garhammer, 1993; Harman, 1994; Ariel, 2001). The goal of many weight-training protocols is to increase power output of the athletes being trained, but research has introduced some of the shortcomings of using free weights during traditional movements such as the bench press. Ariel (2001) discussed how the inertial properties associated with the acceleration and concurrent velocity of the bar and body alignment can change the resistance throughout the range of motion. Since the load present in the active muscles during the bench is subject to both biomechanical leverage and the length tension curve, the muscle experiences maximal tension only during small portions of the lift. Elliot et al. (1989) demonstrated that during 1RM (one repetition maximum) bench press trials the bar decelerates during the final 24% of the concentric motion. During bench presses at 81% of the individuals’ 1RM, the bar decelerates during the final 52% of the concentric range of motion. The aforementioned phenomenon can relate to decreases in bar velocity, reductions in power output, and a reduction in the physiological recruitment of motor units. Essentially strength and power, in conjunction to motor unit recruitment, are emphasized during the initial portions of the concentric phase of the lift, but than taper off considerably during the end of the motion (Sale & MacDougall, 1981). This is contraindicated due to the frequent utilization of the terminal ranges of motions during dynamic activities, and thus these ranges of motion should receive adequate attention.

Many coaches, researchers, and athletes have developed various solutions to compensate for the shortcomings of many weight lifting movements. These solutions include, accommodating leverage machines, iso-inertal machines, compensatory accelerations training (CAT), plyometric training, and contrast training (Behm, 1988; Jesse et al., 1988; Lander et al., 1985; Newton et al., 1995).

Contrast training, a hybrid method developed from accommodative or variable resistance, incorporates the use of heavy elastic bands in addition to free weights. Behm (1998) hypothesized that the use of bands and free weights simultaneously would increase the effectiveness of the lift by complementation. He suggested that this method would allow the shortcomings of each to be augmented by their strengths. The use of elastic bands will create little resistance at the initiation of the concentric portion of the lift but will increase with bar displacement. This increase in resistance will recruit additional motor units to aid in completion of the lift. Behm claimed that the elastic bands would control the momentum of the weights and provide the needed additional or compensatory resistance during the lockout portion of the lift (Lim & Chow, 1998).

Many researchers have examined the effectiveness of eccentric loading and overloading and the concurrent influence on the stretch-shortening cycle (SSC) on the resultant concentric potentiation. Doan et al., (2002) investigated the use of eccentric overloading on the traditional bench press. By using weight releasers that disengage from the bar at the end of the eccentric motion, they were able to increase each subject’s eccentric load by 5% of their bench press maximum. Each subject’s 1RM was retested with the addition of the 5% eccentric load. The resultant data revealed an immediate increase of 5-15 pounds for all subjects involved. From this data, the researchers deduced that the immediate increase in strength must be partial due to the increase of the load-induced stretch in the serial elastic components involved in the SSC.

Research on SSC exercises, or reactive exercise, recognizes that regardless of contraction history, higher levels of musculotendon stretch prior to concentric potentiation results in a greater functional state for the involved musculature. This allows the involved musculature to facilitate greater force generation. Research states that restitution of elastic strain energy, myoelectric potentiation, interaction effects of contractile components with tendinous structures, and chemomechanical potentiation, can all affect the level of stretch-induced gains in muscle function (Bosco, 1982; Cavagna, 1968; Ettema, 1990). Furthermore, the greatest influences of these reactions are experienced during the initial 500 ms of the concentric motion (Jenson et al., 1991; Svantesson, et al., 1994). This research helps confirm that increased activation prior to concentric potentiation can lead to increased excitation for concentric work (Walsh, 1997; Fenn, 1931).

References

Ariel, Gedeon (2001). Resistive exercise methods. Available Internet: http://www.arielnet.com/Main/adw-26g.html

Baechle (Ed.), Essentials of strength and conditioning (pp. 314-344). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Basmajian, J.V., & De Luca, Carlo, J. (1985). Muscles alive: Their Functions revealed by electromyography (5th ed.). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.

Behm, D.G. (1988). Surgical tubing for sport and velocity specific training. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 10 (4), 66-70.

Bosco, C., Viitasalo, J.T., Komi, P.V., Luhtanen, P. (1982). Combined effect of elastic energy and myoelectrical potentiation during stretch-shortening exercises. Acta Physiol. Scand., 114, 557-565.

Cavagna, G.A., Dusman, B., Margaria, R. (1968). Positive work done by a preciously stretched muscle. J. Appl. Physiol, 24, 21-32.

De Luca, Carlo, J. (1993). The use of surface electromyography in biomechanics. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Society for Biomechanics [Online]. Available Internet: http://www.delsys.com/emg_articles/biomechanics.shtml.

Delsys, Inc. (1996). Surface electromyography detection and recording. Available Internet: Http://www.ultranet.com/~delsys/EMG.shtml

Doan, B.K., Newton, R.U., Marsit, J.L., Triplett-McBride, T., Koziris, L.P., Fry, A.C., Kraemer, W.J. (2002). Effects of eccentric loading on bench press 1RM. Journal Of Strength and Conditioning Research. 16(1), 9-13.

Elliot, B.C., G.J. Wilson. (1989). A Biomechanical analysis of the sticking region in the bench press. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., 21, 450-462.

Ettema, G.J., Van Soest, Huijing, P.A. (1990). The role of series elastic structures in prestretched-induced work enhancement during isotonic and isokinetic contractions. J. Exp. Biol. 154, 121-136.

Fenn, W.O., Brody, H., Petrilli, A. (1931). The tension developed by human muscles at different velocities of shortening. Am. J. Physiol. 97, 1-14.

Garhammer, J.A. (1993). A review of power output studies of Olympic and powerlifting. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 7(2), 76-89.

Harman, E. (1994). Resistance training Modes: A Biomechanical Perspective. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 16(2), 59-65.

Jenson, R.C., Warren, B., Laursen, C., Morrissey, M.C. (1991). Static pre-load effect on knee extensor isokinetic concentric and eccentric performance. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 23, 10-14.

Jesse, C., McGee, D., Gibson, J., Stone, M., Williams, J. (1998). A comparison of Nautilus and free weight training. J. Appl. Sports Sci. Res., 3(2), 59.

Lamb, Robert, & Hobart, David. (1992). Anatomic and physiologic basis for surgace electromyography. In Gary L. Sodergerg (ed.), Selected topics in surface electromyography for use in the occupational setting: Expert perspectives (pp. 6-22). (DHSS (NIOSH) Publication No. 91-100). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Lander, J.E., Bates, B.T., Sawhill, J.A., Hamill, J. (1985). A comparison between free-weight and iso-kinetic bench pressing. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 17, 344-353.

Larson, G.D., Jr., And J.A. Potteiger. A comparison of the three different rest intervals between multiple squat bouts. J. Strength and Cond. Res. 11(2): 115-118. 1997.

Lim, Young-Tae, Chow, John W. (1998). Electromyographic comparison of the biceps curls performed using a dumbbell and an elastic tubing. Paper presented at the North American Congress on Biomechanics.

Newton, R.U., Humphries, B., Murphy, A., Wilson, G.J., Kraemer, W.J. (1995). Biomechanics and neural Activation during fast bench press movements: Implications for power training. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 9(3), 195.

Sale, D. G. (1986). Neural adaptation in strength and power training. In N. L. Jones, N. McCartney, & A. J. McComas (Eds.) Human muscle power (pp. 289-307). Champaign, Il: Human Kinetics.

Siff, Mel C., & Verkhoshansky, Yuri V. (1999). Supertraining (4th ed.). Denver, CO: Supertraining International.

Svantesson, U., Grimby, G., Thomee, R. (1994). Potentiation of concentric plantar flexion torque following eccentric and isometric muscle actions. Acta Physiol. Scand. 152, 287-293.

Zatsiorsky, Vladimir. (1995). Science and practice of strength training. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Other articles by Tony Reynolds, MS, CSCS, YCS Level II



 

© 2000-2024 Steroid.com By viewing this page you agree and understand our Privacy Policy and Disclaimer. return to top of page
Anabolic Steroids
 
Anabolic Review